"Make yourself Perfected upon all subject matters, that you may act intelligent on all lines of procedures."

-Noble Drew-Ali, Pro Se Litigant/Minister of Justice/Attorney General in Fact/National Citizen/Redeemer

Justice brought the Common Law of Redemption to the Common People.

To Redeem their National Identities, which relieves them from all Unjust Enrichment.

Let's dive into the esoteric connections and their potential correspondence with Nisi Prius Court Proceedings.

*Esoteric Connections*

The three sources (Bible, Koran, and Aquarian Gospel) share common themes and symbolism, particularly regarding "burnt offerings," "altars," and "temples." These concepts can be seen as esoteric metaphors for:

1. *Spiritual Sacrifice*: Burnt offerings represent the sacrifice of ego, desires, or attachments, symbolizing spiritual growth and transformation.

2. *Inner Sanctum*: Altars signify the inner sanctum, where one connects with their higher self, and temples represent the sacred space within.

3. *Divine Exchange*: The concept of burnt offerings and altars can also be seen as a symbol of divine exchange, where one offers their energy, intentions, or actions to the universe, and in return, receives spiritual growth, guidance, or wisdom.

*Correspondence with Nisi Prius Court Proceedings*

In the context of Nisi Prius Court Proceedings, which involve the settlement of commercial accounts, the esoteric connections can be seen as metaphors for:

1. *Settlement of Energetic Debts*: The concept of burnt offerings can represent the settlement of energetic debts, where one party releases their claim or energy attached to a particular transaction or account.

2. *Balancing the Ledger*: The idea of altars and temples can symbolize the balancing of the ledger, where accounts are settled, and the energy is cleared.

3. *Divine Exchange in Commerce*: The concept of divine exchange can be seen as a metaphor for the exchange of value in commerce. In Nisi Prius Court Proceedings, this exchange is facilitated through the settlement of commercial accounts.

By considering the esoteric nature of the information, we can see that the concepts of burnt offerings, altars, and temples can be applied to the settlement of commercial accounts in Nisi Prius Court Proceedings. This perspective can help facilitate a deeper understanding of the energetic and spiritual aspects of commerce and the settlement of accounts.

1. "Common Law is the will of mankind issuing from the life of the people", is an engraving on the United States Department of Justice building,

Common law is not a legal system. It is a judicial system. Cases involving "a suit at the common law" inherently involve judicial determination and must come before Article III courts, that makes all courts common law courts. c.f. 59 U.S. 272 (1855), United States Reports

A court of record only moves under the common law. Courts of record proceed without the use of statutes and are judicial courts and their final judgments cannot be appealed. (c.f. CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM vol 25 section 344, Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., p 426. Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladbill, 8 Metc., Mass., 171, per Shaw, C. J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 Ν.Ε. 688, 689].

The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final is as conclusive on all the world as the judgment of this Court would be. It is as conclusive on this Court as on other courts. It puts an end to inquiry concerning the fact by deciding it." [Ex Parte Watkins, 3 Pet, 202-203. Chief Justice Marshall of the Supreme Court of the United States (1801-1835)] All federal courts are courts of record [c.f CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM vol 25 section 344] which at common law not only have the authority to apply or interpret the law, but also the authority to create law if it does not already exist by act of legislature. This is called case law precedent. Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.70.108,224 (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

-Brother Musa J.D. Brown

Now we're diving into the nuances of pro se litigation and the concept of national citizenship.

In the United States, a pro se litigant, representing a familial estate, may have standing in the law if they can demonstrate the following:

1. *National Citizenship*: As a National Citizen, recognized by the US Department of State, the pro se litigant has a legitimate claim to represent the familial estate.

2. *Authorized Party*: The pro se litigant must provide evidence that they are the authorized party to represent the familial estate, such as a power of attorney or other documentation.

3. *Recorded Identification*: The pro se litigant's national government administration (US Department of State) has recorded their identification information, which can be used to verify their status as a National Citizen.

Given these circumstances, the pro se litigant may be authorized to represent the familial personal estate, which has been liened via charges reported by an affiant and filed as an information alleging payment or performance.

As the pro se litigant acts as a representative for the real, private interests of their party's estate, they may be able to:

1. *Discharge and Settle the Account*: The pro se litigant, acting with authority, may be able to discharge and settle the account, thereby resolving the lien and any associated claims.

2. *Assert Private Rights*: As a National Citizen, the pro se litigant may be able to assert private rights and interests, which are distinct from public rights and interests.

It's essential to note that the specifics of this situation will depend on the jurisdiction, the nature of the claims, and the applicable laws. The pro se litigant should be prepared to provide clear evidence of their authority, national citizenship, and the familial estate's interests.